The Oppo Find X3 Lite features a quadruple photo sensor. A framework is no longer intended only for high-end mobiles. Therefore, at f / 1.7 we have the right to a 64 mph opening and the main block of extreme wide-angle at 8 mph (f / 2.2). A macro sensor (2 MPX, f / 2.4) and deep module (2 MPX, f / 2.4) complete the image, although their use is not necessarily high instances.
We will compare them Pixel 4A5G – If possible – Champion in his category.
Volume Primary: 64 MPx, f / 1,7, Eg 26 mm.
The day-to-day Oppo module works well. The scene is readable though a little too much. We use a good amount of detail, but we notice that the colors do not bite beyond everything. This is especially true when looking at the shots on the bottom left. The Pixel 4A5G This last step is much better.
At night, the Oppo Find X3 Lite defends itself as much as possible, but is forced to soften the image very strongly. Alas, the colors are unnatural. The pixel 4a enhances the digital noise as opposed to the 5G, but it also allows a good amount of detail to be maintained.
The main module of the Oppo Find X3 Lite is positive Pixel-pinning, Which allows the pixels to combine into four to capture more light when exiting. The phone then captures images by default at 16 Mpx. But can force the full definition in systems. So let’s start by comparing images at 16 Mpx with images at 64 Mpx. As usual, we isolated the same (0.90 MPx) portion of each scene. Thus you can see the difference in definition.
Day by day, the transitions between the two scenes are subtle. The change in definition makes it possible to sculpt the image better, but not much. This can be seen especially in the paintings.
Since the image is naturally very hard at night, the 64 MPX mode offers the opportunity to crop a well-defined image above all else.
Mode Ultra Grand-Angle: 8 MPX, f / 2.2, 119
Ultra wide-angle mode may be present in a large number of smartphones, which is (very) rarely reliable. The Oppo Find X3 Lite is also trying its luck against the Pixel 4A5G.
Day by day, the result is compatible, but very smooth throughout. The image loses its sharpness, making it easier to feel compared to the other shot. Colors are often depreciating.
At night, the result is almost unusable. The algorithm tries to compensate as much as possible by itself, and we can read what is written in the book, but we are not far from the porridge of pixels. The difference with the Pixel 4a 5G is obvious.
Front and video module
On the front, the smartphone offers a 32MPX (f / 2.4) sensor. Selfies are good and portraiture is efficient. Effect Bokeh Really well defined, and the faces are not very smooth as is often the case with Chinese brands. Many filters and effects are available to fans of social networks who want their abstracts to disappear. So this is a good front module.
The smartphone can shoot at 30 fps (unstable) in 4K, but can shoot up to 120 fps in Full HD. The rendering is overall satisfactory and we can have fun even in slow-motion mode at 240 fps in HD.
“Avid writer. Subtly charming alcohol fanatic. Total twitter junkie. Coffee enthusiast. Proud gamer. Web aficionado. Music advocate. Zombie lover. Reader.”
More Stories
What Does the Future of Gaming Look Like?
Throne and Liberty – First Impression Overview
Ethereum Use Cases