The GPU of the Apple M1 Max surpasses all Intel-powered laptops

The first MacBook Pro launched at the beginning of the week begins to be used in nature, so the results of performance measurements can be found, especially on the Geekbench site. The CPU was The start of the week has already passed, But it still does not have the integrated GPU on the Apple M1 Pro and Mac. Macromers A Put my hand up In a metal test that measures the performance of the GPU, but it is not enough to make all the useful decisions.

Marks Will be displayed by this test Is 68,870 points. Like all benches this number does not refer to itself and it is only interesting to compare the machines with each other. So let’s compare: this score is three times higher than the GPU of the Apple M1 22,000 points is the best. This was expected, but this chip had to compete with the dedicated GPUs for laptops, which was the goal given by the manufacturer.

If we stick to the Mac, this score is significantly better than AMD’s Radeon Pro 5600M, which was the largest graphics card that can be installed on a 16-inch Intel MacBook Pro. She released a result in the same test of about 42,500 points, the Apple M1 Max will do about 1.5 times better than her according to this first test.

We would like to use this measurement to compare with a portable RTX 3080, As Apple did during its keynote addressBut, there are many obstacles to this comparison. First, Metal is Apple’s House API, which does not run on Windows. However, there is another benchmark of the MacBook Pro Made with OpenCL, A standard also available for Windows.

A score of 60,167 points is disappointing in the face of Apple’s promises because it is still low For an RTX 3060, Not to mention the high-end version cited by Apple. But keep in mind that the OpenCL test is not optimal for Apple silicon chips, which puts the MacBook Pro at a disadvantage. Also, there are the first GFXBench tests Appeared in its database And these concrete actions and those close to the actual gaming environment give a completely different picture.

At the moment, the Apple M1 Max stands out and is comparable in scores. RTX 3080 Portable. From one test to the next, Apple’s chip may be slightly below Nvidia’s GPU, but both are comparable and ahead Radeon Pro 5600M, Which was the best option on a small Mac. By the way, the Apple M1 Pro is Listed, Scores higher than Nvidia’s GPU, which is a big surprise.

Another problem to note is that we do not know which configurations of Apple chips were tested each time. As we described yesterday, there are several variants on each chip, and the Apple M1 Mac has two options for the number of GPU cores: 24 at the entry level and 32 at the top end.

Geekbench’s Metal Test says nothing about the core number, OpenCL is listed 32, but see if it’s the same Mac or trusted counter. For GFXBench, this is not a given information. If we are to trust Apple, the GPU of the Apple M1 Max should be four times faster than the Apple M1, which supports the hypothesis of a flange chip on the metal score.

Undoubtedly even if a first result comes out we will be cautious with these first steps. The new MacBook Pro can deliver the best graphics performance ever offered on a portable Mac. If it is a tested high-end version, the score is much higher than the previous best option. And if it is a variant with 24 cores “only”, it means that we can expect even better results.

We can measure the gap with GPUs dedicated to desktop computers. Mac Pro, the best GPU currently offered with the Radeon Pro W6900X, can reach the geekbench score with metal Exceeds 182,000 points, 2.6 times more than the Apple M1 Max. Apple would have found the solution with its own chips, however: to multiply hearts. IfWe believe the rumors, The Mac Pro may have four times more GPU cores, which should be enough to reap the benefits.