Michela Roston downloads Renzi: “I will vote for hope. I do not share the choice of Italy Viva. Serious mistake crisis in the dark” – Napoli Village

Naples – “I have decided to vote for the Conte government. I do it because there is a big difference between government criticism and government crisis, and the difference is called politics, that is, seeking solutions, trying to understand. Of the uncertainties and mistakes made in managing the epidemic, both health and social and economic, it is right to press the government to its weak points – indeed; It is right to ask for more commitment, more cooperation, more respect for democratic rules. But the crisis, no. The withdrawal of ministers, then the withdrawal of confidence in the government and the opening of a crisis in the dark, at such a historic moment, seems to be the most serious and urgent election. ” Michela Roston, deputy chairwoman of the Chamber of Community Affairs, announced her vote in favor of the Conte government.

“This is not a coincidence – Roston continues – citizens do not understand this situation and do not share it. I have received hundreds of messages of disappointment: they do not compete against government criticism, but rather are partially shared. The gap in politics is a last resort, not a starting point for negotiations.The Italians, at this time, are caught between the fear of the virus and their concern for themselves and their loved ones, sometimes through the pain of loss, the economic consequences of the epidemic, and the fear that the outcome is far from over. Not the government, they want a more efficient and ready government, not a sad government.The severity of the economic crisis, the jobs lost, the future unknown to many families, We add this because social drama can be much longer than a health emergency. Citizens’ hope is that they will learn at the wheel how to make the right decisions: controlling the epidemic, economic rejuvenation, vaccination campaigning, building the future. If the government collapses, in a crisis with confusing, conflicting definitions, who does it? That’s the question everyone is asking. “

“If we want to listen to the citizens as well as our duty, – the deputy concludes – we can not ignore the wave of frustration that is strongly felt in connection with the opening of this crisis. Now, with the epidemic, with the fear of a third wave, with 80,000 deaths, with the complexity of the vaccine campaign, with the difficulty of restarting, restructuring, throwing away the government we have formed and abandoning mediation? It is necessary to rediscover the spirit of President Matterella’s message. To build, not to demolish. First, to create dialogue, organization, agreement, understanding.